Site Navigation


Currently:
Configuring anonymous public shares with Samba 3

Posted on Monday 31 July 2006

On the fileserver I run, I use samba to conveniently access my files. I like Samba. I can mount it on any machine I run and access my files like it’s any other filesystem, but when it comes to sharing files to other (anonymous) users, Samba has to cope with some ugly Windows legacy. After all, Samba is just an open source implementation of SMB/CIFS which Windows calls “Windows File Sharing”. Let’s look at the differences and how to cope with them.

The Windows way

When a Windows client tries to access a share on a Windows server, it requests the given share using username and password of the current user on the client. The Windows server will then look for this username/password combination and if it exists, grants the user access to the share with the proper rights assigned. If it can’t find the username, it falls back to an anonymous user and grants access anyway (if this is policy).

How Samba handles it

This is where Samba differs. If set to security=user (which is a good idea anyway), when a user requests access to a share, it too looks up the credentials in a backend. However, if the user is unknown to the system, the default behaviour is to deny access. This is kind of unfriendly to Windows users, since they aren’t used to type in “guest” as a username and refuse to understand how to log in a way different from what they are used. This is how to set up your public shares to imitate Windows behaviour.

How to imitate Windows behavior using Samba

In my example, I’ve got one public share, on which I want to have full rights for myself and limited (read-only) access to all anonymous users. The name of the share will be “public”:

#/etc/samba/smb.conf
[public]
        comment = Public Campusnet Shares
        browsable = yes
        path = /data/pub
        public = yes
        writable = no
        write list = dawuss
        guest ok = yes

This sets up a share named “public” which is shown when browsing the server to any user with rights to do so. You can see it is public, but not writable except for “dawuss” (which is me) and that it is ok for guests to login.

Next, we need to set up the guest access itself. In the global section:

[global]
        #...
        guest account = nobody

Which defines the account to use when authenticating guests. Don’t forget to create this user using

# smbpasswd -an nobody

This will create the user with no password.

Now we have a perfectly valid Samba setup with a public share, but every time a user wants to access this share as a guest, he will have to do so by logging in as “nobody”. To complete our setup and imitate Windows behaviour, add the following line to the smb.conf global section:

[global]
        #...
        map to guest = bad user

This maps any unknown username to the specified guest user, so login always succeeds.

We’re done! Remember, this will only work for unknown usernames. If an unhappy user called “pete” tries to login while there already exists a pete on the server with a different password, he will be denied access. This is normal behaviour when imitating Windows, so we’ll just have to live with that.


  • Bookmark using:

12 Comments for 'Configuring anonymous public shares with Samba 3'

  1.  
    20 December, 2006 | 07:37
     

    Thanks for this great explanation :)

  2.  
    ruslanas
    13 January, 2007 | 16:29
     

    Thank you…exactly that I was looking for..it solves my problem..

  3.  
    20 January, 2007 | 03:08
     

    Exactly what I was looking for !

  4.  
    24 April, 2007 | 13:57
     

    Thanks, this works perfectly for transparent sharing to our (Windows) LAN at work.

  5.  
    greap
    27 April, 2007 | 01:38
     

    This was just what I was looking for!
    The samba man pages are just too damn complicated.

  6.  
    bmestep
    11 May, 2007 | 05:21
     

    BRILLIANT!! Exactly what I needed.

  7.  
    30 July, 2007 | 00:17
     

    […] I found this configuration, which had some components that all the others missed. Here are key steps that had been absent in […]

  8.  
    5 September, 2007 | 02:32
     

    Just what I was looking for. Thanks a lot.

  9.  
    Tom
    18 September, 2007 | 18:53
     

    Excellent article - exactly what I needed - Thanks ….

  10.  
    Tomasz N
    3 March, 2008 | 00:25
     

    Thanks :)
    “map to guest” - that was I was missing

  11.  
    Ralfs
    14 August, 2008 | 16:06
     

    worked perfectly! tnx

  12.  
    Daniel Sampson
    3 October, 2008 | 09:05
     

    Perfect explanation and implementation - thank you.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Information for comment users
Line and paragraph breaks are implemented automatically. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Please consider what you're posting.

Use the buttons below to customise your comment.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI